Abramović’s experiment is frequently studied alongside infamous psychological evaluations like the Stanford Prison Experiment or the Milgram Shock Experiment. It proves that in the absence of societal consequences and legal boundaries, human beings are easily steered toward cruelty.
Abramović stood still for six hours, offering herself as a passive participant for the audience to interact with using various items provided on a nearby table. These 72 objects
staged a six-hour performance that would change the course of art history
The premise was deceptively simple, a dangerous game of cause and effect. Abramović placed 72 objects on a table—ranging from pleasurable to lethal—and invited the public to use them on her however they wished, for a duration of six hours. She took full responsibility, even if it resulted in her death.
A rose, a feather, honey, grapes, olive oil, perfume, and a mirror. marina abramovic rhythm 0 performance video
When the six hours ended and Abramović finally began to move toward the crowd as a human being again, the audience fled. She later reflected, . The Legacy of Rhythm 0
Because video technology was not as readily utilized by Abramović at that stage of her career (she began heavily relying on video to capture her temporal art around 1976), the primary mediums documenting
This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later.
The archival video documentation captures a terrifying shift in the room's energy: These 72 objects staged a six-hour performance that
In December 2025, the Ukrainian-British artist Briony Godivala posted a TikTok video that explicitly cited Rhythm 0 as an inspiration for her own QR-code–based performance work, demonstrating the continued relevance of Abramović's framework for the social media age.
The imagery captures the chilling effects of deindividuation, where individuals within a crowd may act in ways they never would in isolation.
So search for the clip. Watch the rose turn into a thorn. Watch the honey turn into blood. And when the video ends and Marina walks toward the fleeing crowd, ask yourself: Would you have stayed? Or would you have run?
There are 72 objects on the table that one can use on me as desired.Performance.I am the object.During this period I take full responsibility.Duration: 6 hours (8 pm – 2 am). A rose, a feather, honey, grapes, olive oil,
She also revealed a detail not visible in the : after the performance, she could not stand the touch of another human being for months. She went home, locked herself in a room, and reported feeling "dead."
The museum lights hummed quietly. A single long table sat beneath them, bare except for sixty-three objects arranged like a morbid buffet: roses, honey, scissors, a feather, a whip, a gun with a single bullet, a loaded silence that weighed on the gallery air. Behind the table, a chair waited. Before it, a crowd gathered, curious and dislocated—their phones not yet ubiquitous, but their eyes hungry.
Rhythm 0 remains a landmark piece of performance art. It is a stark illustration of the principles of the (obedience to authority) and the Stanford prison experiment (the dehumanization of "subjects"), played out in a real-world artistic setting. It exposes the fragility of democratic morality and the capacity for cruelty when individuals feel unaccountable for their actions.
Additionally, a short film/slideshow titled (created in 2013) compiles the surviving photographs and audio recordings of the night. It can be found on academic databases and art streaming platforms like MUBI, where it is classified as a documentary. These clips capture the artist herself describing the terror of that night, often visibly emotional, stating: "I really want to take this risk, I want to know what is the public about and what they do in this kind of situation."